DOE wonders if nuclear energy hydrogen production could help save nuclear power
October 14, 2019Nuclear is struggling to compete in certain markets.
Nuclear energy hydrogen production, which would involve using nuclear’s thermal heat and electricity to produce hydrogen, could help existing nuclear energy to compete in certain markets. According to the Office of Nuclear Energy, with the rise of more renewables going live on the grid, many American utilities are considering a hybrid or integrated systems approach to better the economics for baseload energy sources like nuclear reactors.
Since 2013, nine nuclear units have been prematurely shut down.
The number of nuclear reactors are decreasing in America. The number dropped to 96 this past September (2019), when Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station was shut down in Pennsylvania.
The Office of Nuclear Energy notes that since 2013, nine nuclear units have prematurely shut down, with another eight scheduled for early retirement. If this trend continues, the country could lose over 10% of its nuclear capacity within the next ten years. This is significant because nuclear produces almost 20% of the nation’s power and 55% of its clean electricity.
Some of the reasons why nuclear is struggling in certain markets is due to a lack of market value and historically lower natural gas prices. It is thought that nuclear energy hydrogen production may be one of the ways to help it overcome some of the challenges it faces.
Nuclear energy hydrogen production could help meet global demand for hydrogen.
The global demand for hydrogen and its many emerging application could increase by a factor of ten, which would support the current infrastructure for generating and delivering this clean, alternative power, according to the Office of Nuclear Energy.
To meet the growing demand, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is seeking new ways to develop technologies via its H2@Scale initiative. This includes finding ways to efficiently scale-up hydrogen production using all of America’s energy sources, including nuclear.
It is believed that existing nuclear power plants can generate hydrogen in a number of ways that would dramatically lower air emissions while, at the same time, taking advantage of the continual thermal energy and electricity that nuclear reliably provides.
“A single 1,000 megawatt nuclear reactor could produce more than 200,000 tonnes of hydrogen each year,” says the Office of Nuclear Energy. Adding that “Ten nuclear reactors could produce about 2 million tonnes annually or one-fifth of the current hydrogen used in the United States.”
Ultimately, beyond nuclear energy hydrogen production, nuclear power has the potential to support America’s manufacturing industries across a variety of sectors by delivering clean energy to produce fuels, fertilizers, plastics, steels and other chemicals.
With over 15 years of reporting hydrogen news, we are your premier source for the latest updates and insights in hydrogen and renewable energy.
How much would it cost to produce hydrogen from nuclear plants? A lot and much more than simply creating hydrogen using natural gas. That is how most U.S. hydrogen is produced.
Using electricity to produce hydrogen thru electrolysis requires a lot of energy. Nuclear power is one of the most expensive ways to produce electricity. Bottom line, it is not remotely competitive to use nuclear power plants to produce hydrogen.
Assuming we have a bunch of expensive hydrogen, now what? There is no distribution system for getting the gas to users. Then there is the matter of the lack of machines to use the hydrogen.
If you want emissions-free transportation, use electric vehicles. Duh. Much more cost effective and practical. The distribution system already exists; the electrical grid. There are machines that can use electricity – take a bow Tesla and Elon Musk.
Just another dumb idea brought to you by the DOE nuclear folks who have managed to spend billions of dollars with no commercial successes. But then, that really is not their objective. Rather, the goal is to line the pockets of the DOE by conducting never ending, and not particularly useful, research and development while attempting to pick marketplace winners and losers. The D.C. Swamp in action.
Hydrogen is actually used in a large number of chemical industry processes. However, using obsolete nuclear reactors to create the gas is economically dumb.